Proposed Special Improvement District (SID) for Flood Recovery and Hazard Mitigation
Upper Pine River Fire Protection District — Vallecito Creek Corridor
1. Purpose of the Plan
This Comprehensive Improvement Plan outlines the need, scope, benefits, and implementation strategy for establishing a Special Improvement District (SID) to support flood‑recovery and hazard‑mitigation improvements along Vallecito Creek and adjacent affected areas. The plan is intended to provide the Upper Pine River Fire Protection District Board with the information necessary to initiate SID formation.
2. Background and Need
2.1 Flood Events and Impacts
The 2025 flood events along Vallecito Creek caused significant damage to private property, public infrastructure, and emergency‑access routes. Impacts include:
• Large debris deposits obstructing natural flow
• Bank erosion and channel migration threatening homes and access roads
• Undermined driveways and culverts
• Loss of safe emergency‑response corridors
• Increased risk of future flood damage due to unstable channel conditions
These conditions pose ongoing threats to life, property, and emergency response.
2.2 Public Safety Considerations
Upper Pine River Fire Protection District has statutory responsibility to protect life and property. Flood‑related damage has:
• Reduced access for fire, EMS, and rescue operations
• Increased response times
• Created hazardous conditions for residents and responders
• Compromised evacuation routes
Mitigation is necessary to restore safe access and reduce future risk.
3. Purpose of the Special Improvement District (SID)
The SID will provide a fair, transparent, and legally supported mechanism to:
• Fund flood‑recovery and hazard‑mitigation improvements
• Coordinate work across multiple properties
• Leverage state and federal cost‑share programs
The SID ensures that properties receiving direct benefit contribute proportionally to the cost of improvements.
4. Proposed Improvements
The following improvements are proposed within the SID boundary. Final design will be completed in coordination with NRCS and qualified engineers.
4.1 Debris Removal
• Removal of flood‑deposited woody debris, sediment, and obstructions
• Restoration of natural flow paths
• Reduction of future blockage and overtopping risk
4.2 Channel and Bank Stabilization
• Rock armoring, bioengineering, or structural stabilization
• Re‑establishment of stable channel geometry
• Protection of homes, driveways, and utilities
4.3 Culvert and Access Protection
• Armoring of driveway crossings
• Protection of emergency‑access routes
4.4 Drainage and Flood‑Flow Improvements
• Regrading to restore natural drainage
• Removal of artificial berms or blockages
• Improvements to reduce overbank flooding
5. SID Boundary
The SID boundary will include properties that directly benefit from the improvements. A map and legal description will be prepared by the District in consultation with landowners and partner agencies.
6. Cost Estimate and Funding Strategy
6.1 Preliminary Cost Estimate
Costs will include:
• Engineering and design
• Environmental permitting
• Construction and materials
• Project management
A refined estimate will be prepared during the SID formation process.
6.2 Funding Sources
The SID may utilize:
• NRCS Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP) cost‑share
• State or county emergency‑mitigation funds
• SID assessments on benefiting properties
• Supplemental funding
6.3 Assessment Structure
Assessments may be based on:
• Benefit received
• Frontage
• Acreage
• Hazard exposure
• A hybrid method
The goal is an “Equal Share” approach or total amount parceled out evenly. The District will select a method that is equitable and legally defensible.
6.4 Prepayment Option
Yet to be determined… the goal is: Property owners may pay their assessment in full before financing is finalized. Remaining assessments will be financed over a defined term, (typically 10–20 years) aim is 10 years.
7. Implementation Timeline
Phase 1 — SID Formation (30 days)
• Public Education
• Board Resolution of Intent
• Public notice and petition
• Resolution Creating the SID
• Assessment roll preparation
Phase 2 — Design and Permitting (30–60days: already begun)
• Engineering design
• NRCS coordination
• Environmental and regulatory approvals
Phase 3 — Construction (60–180 days)
• Mobilization
• Debris removal
• Channel stabilization
• Access and drainage improvements
8. Benefits of the SID
For Landowners
• Coordinated, professional mitigation work
• Reduced flood risk
• Protection of property and access
• Eligibility for federal cost‑share
• Predictable, equitable cost structure
For the Fire District
• Restored emergency‑access routes
• Reduced response times
• Improved safety for responders
• Long‑term hazard reduction
For the Community
• Increased resilience
• Protection of watershed function
• Reduced future disaster costs
9. Transition, Extension, or Termination of the SID
9.1 Purpose of This Section
9.2 Completion of Improvements and Transition to Stewardship
Upon completion of the SID‑funded improvements, the District will:
• Verify that all work has been completed in accordance with approved designs, permits, and funding‑agency requirements.
• Conduct a final inspection with NRCS, engineers and affected landowners.
• Formally close out construction contracts and grant agreements.
Once construction is complete, ongoing stewardship responsibilities—such as routine monitoring, vegetation establishment, and minor maintenance—may transition to:
• A voluntary landowner group or association, or
• Another local entity willing to assume stewardship.
The District may provide guidance on best practices for long‑term maintenance but will not retain permanent responsibility unless separately authorized.
9.3 Mechanism to Extend the SID
If landowners determine that additional work, follow‑up stabilization, or long‑term maintenance should be coordinated and funded collectively, the SID may be extended. An extension may be initiated when:
• Additional improvements are needed to maintain the function of the original project,
• New hazards emerge that require coordinated mitigation, or
• Landowners wish to establish a long‑term maintenance program.
An extension requires:
• A petition from the required percentage of landowners,
• A Board Resolution of Intent,
• Public notice and hearing, and
• A Resolution Extending or Modifying the SID.
Any extension will include a new scope of work, updated cost estimates, and a revised assessment structure.
9.4 Termination of the SID
The SID may be terminated once:
• All improvements have been completed,
• All financial obligations (including bonds or financing instruments) have been satisfied, and
• All grant or cost‑share requirements have been closed out.
Upon termination:
• The SID ceases to levy assessments,
• The District issues a final report documenting completion, and
• The SID boundary and assessment roll are formally dissolved.
Termination does not prevent landowners from forming a new SID in the future if additional coordinated work becomes necessary.
10. Conclusion
The proposed SID provides a fair, efficient, and legally supported mechanism to complete essential flood‑recovery and hazard‑mitigation work along Vallecito Creek. The improvements will protect life, property, and emergency‑access routes while leveraging available state and federal funding.